United States v. Newbert
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON GOVERNMENT AND DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
The Court concludes that the Defendant’s successful motion to withdraw his guilty plea, based on post-plea evidence of his actual innocence, does not constitute a breach of the plea agreement and, therefore, evidence of the entry of his guilty plea and his statements leading to the guilty plea are admissible in his upcoming trial only in accordance with Federal Rule of Evidence 410.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
On June 7, 2006, at the Rule 11 hearing, Winslow Newbert admitted that he was guilty of possession with the intent…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Halbert v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Christian LopezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Robert R. Krilich, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. NewbertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- State v. NewbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- United States v. NewbertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- United States v. NewbertDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008