Legal Opinion

Farley v. Carp

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 2010No. Docket 283405, 283418, 283726, 283727, 284319, and 284681PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

This trio of cases provides us with the opportunity to determine the scope of the applicability of this Court’s recent decision in Kidder v Ptacin,1 which held that relief from a judgment was not appropriate where the case had been dismissed in accordance with a directive of this Court and the appellate process had been concluded. Although originally submitted as three separate cases, because of the common issue presented in light of Kidder, on our own motion we consolidated these cases for purposes of argument and decision. In these appeals, we hold that the Kidder principle also applies…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Waltz v. WyseMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Omelenchuk v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Falk v. State Bar of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Kidder v. PtacinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Titan Insurance v. HytenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. King v. McPherson HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Asmar Construction Company v. Afr EnterprisesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Christena Johnson v. Jermarx MarshMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Farley v. CarpMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API