People v. Farquharson
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtServhto, J.
The prosecution appeals by delayed leave granted the trial court’s March 25, 2006, order granting defendant’s motion to admit the investigative-subpoena testimony of a now-deceased witness, Andre Mathis, at trial. Because defendant was required to show that the prosecution had a similar motive in developing Mathis’s testimony at the investigative-subpoena hearing before the trial court could admit Mathis’s investigative-subpoena testimony at trial, we vacate the trial court’s order and remand for a determination regarding whether the prosecution had a similar motive in developing Mathis’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. BuieMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- People of Michigan v. Robert Monya GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Elher v. MisraMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re COMPLAINT OF McLEODUSA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.