Luten v. Wilson Reinforced Concrete Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska; Thos. C. Munger, Judge. Suit by Daniel B. Duten against the Wilson Reinforced Concrete Company and others to restrain infringement of patents. From a decree holding three of the patents invalid for want of invention, and the fourth not infringed (254 Fed. 107), complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
AMIDON, District Judge.
This suit was brought by Daniel B. Luten against the Wilson Reinforced Concrete Company and others to restrain infringement of letters patent 853,202, 853,203, 818,386, and 999,663. The case was heard upon elaborate proofs, and the bill dismissed on the ground that patent 999,663 was not infringed, and that the others were void for want of invention. 254 Fed. 107. The case was heard in this court at the same term as Luten v. Young and Luten v. Allen, 263 Fed. 986, —— C. C. A. - (opinion in which is concurrently filed). There is advantage in getting as many of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Luten v. WhittierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Luten v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1918
- Luten v. Wilson Reinforced Concrete Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1917
- Luten v. MarshDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1919
- Luten v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Gerosa v. Apco Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
- Hall v. WrightDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Luten v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Hall v. WrightDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.