Legal Opinion

Luten v. Wilson Reinforced Concrete Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided July 24, 1917No. 19PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Daniel B. Luten against the Wilson Reinforced Concrete Company, in which the State of Nebraska intervenes.

1Opinion of the Court

MUNGER, District Judge.

Suit by Daniel B. Luten, alleging infringement of letters patent issued to him. Of these no evidence was submitted relating to patents numbered 852,970, 852,971, 853,183, and 933,771. The patents relied upon are numbered 818,386, 853,202, 853,203, 999,663, but complainant has abandoned all claims, and has asked to dismiss his bill of complaint, which leave will be granted, as to all other claims except as to claims 1 and 7 of patent numbered 818,386, claim 1'6 of patent numbered 853,202, claims 9, 12, 14, 16, and 18 of patent numbered 853,203, and claim 6 of patent…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Luten v. Wilson Reinforced Concrete Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  2. Gill v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Luten v. WashburnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  4. Luten v. ScottDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API