Legal Opinion
Hall v. Wright
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 17, 1954No. Civ. No. 7839PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
After a partial trial of the issues raised by the original pleadings, both sides were permitted to file amended and supplemental pleadings and new parties were brought in. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. Rules 15, 21, 24, 28 U.S.C.A.
The case then proceeded to trial upon the issues raised by: (1) the second amended complaint for (a) reformation and cancellation of, damages for breach of, and a declaratory judgment as to rights and duties under, an alleged con*271tract dated September 15, 1944 between plaintiff Jesse E. Hall and defendant Kenneth A. Wright, (b) treble damages for alleged…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hall v. WrightDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954