Luten v. Whittier
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio; John E. Safer, Judge. Suit in equity by Daniel B. Uuten against William F. Whittier and others. Decree for defendants, and complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Suit upon United States patents No. 853,203 (May '7, 1907), and No. 1,070,903 (August 19, 1913), both to Daniel B. Uuten. The District Court found both patents invalid for lack of both invention and novelty, and dismissed the bill. This appeal is from that decree of dismissal.
[1] 1. The invention of patent No. 853,203 relates to a method of metal reinforcement of “arches, culverts, and similar bridge structures which are commonly constructed from concrete, stone, brick, mortar, and other similar materials” — being specially applicable to reinforced concrete arch bridges…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Munising Paper Co. v. American Sulphite Pulp Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Star Brass Works v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Detroit Iron & Steel Co. v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- City of Akron v. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Huebner-Toledo Breweries Co. v. Mathews Gravity Carrier Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Davison Chemical Corp. v. Joliet Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- National Lead Company v. Western Lead Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Vandenburgh v. Truscon Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- De Stubner v. United Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.