Legal Opinion
Ditmore v. Michalik
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 2001No. Docket 218078PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, P.J.
Plaintiffs appeal as of right from a judgment and order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition, MCR 2.116(C)(7) and (10). This case arises out of a dispute over the use of, and rights in, real property. We reverse and remand.
Plaintiffs alleged below that they were the equitable owners of certain real property located in Dexter Township, which we will refer to as lot 43, and which is part of a subdivision that Portage Lake Land Company developed. Plaintiffs further alleged that they were the equitable owners of a parcel lying directly between lot 43 and Portage Lake, which the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Forge v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Van v. ZahorikMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Pierson Sand and Gravel, Inc. v. Keeler Brass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Schwartz v. City of FlintMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Dubuc v. Green Oak TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Keywell & Rosenfeld v. BithellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Richards v. TibaldiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.