Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. City of Flint

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1991No. Docket 121219PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals by leave granted the denial of its motion for summary disposition. Defendant argues that plaintiffs claim, seeking money damages for an unconstitutional taking of his property, is barred by res judicata. We agree and reverse.

This action is part of a continuing legal saga that began in 1971 when plaintiff, desiring to erect townhouses and apartment buildings on his property, first instituted a suit claiming that defendant’s single-family residential zoning ordinance was unreasonable as applied to his land. Plaintiffs action was for declaratory relief, seeking to have the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Schwartz v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rogers v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Board of County Road Commissioners v. SchultzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Hofmann v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Richards v. TibaldiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Ditmore v. MichalikMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Begin v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API