Legal Opinion

People v. Gates

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1990No. 83363, (Calendar No. 7)PublishedCited by 172 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

In view of a jury verdict of "no jurisdiction” in a child protective probate proceed*151ing, we are asked to determine whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars subsequent prosecution of the defendant for criminal sexual conduct where the factual allegations against defendant in both proceedings are essentially the same. Because the prior probate court verdict did not necessarily determine the guilt or innocence of the defendant, we hold that the principles of collateral estoppel do not apply.

i

In February, 1986, the Michigan Department of Social Services petitioned the juvenile division of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by172 opinions

  1. People v. TrakhtenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Lucinda Darrah v. City of Oak Park, Russell Bragg, a Troy Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Bonnie Lee Hinchman v. Edwin L. Moore Jr. And Robert A. DombrowskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API