Hendricks v. City of Nampa
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.
Plaintiffs (appellants) brought an action against the defendants (respondents) City of Nampa, Members of the Nampa City Council, Nampa Mayor, Chief of Police and the Nampa City Clerk to have declared void Nampa City Ordinance No. 1045, dated the 21st day of February, 1966. By the terms of the ordinance, properties belonging to plaintiffs and to others not parties to the action were annexed to the city.
Many of the facts are stipulated. It appears that appellants’ properties are located west of the Nampa boundary as it existed prior to the annexation. Prior to annexation,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- City of Lewiston v. MathewsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Idaho Falls v. GrimmettIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
- White v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cole-Collister Fire Protection District v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Mutz v. Municipal Boundary CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Oregon Shortline Railroad Co. v. City of ChubbuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. BowmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Grangeville v. HaskinIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.