Legal Opinion

White v. City of Twin Falls

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1959No. 8711PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORRIS, District Judge.

Appellants own a certain rectangular parcel of real property situate at the northwest corner of the intersection of Blue Lakes Boulevard North and Filer Avenue, within the corporate limits of the City of Twin Falls; its dimensions are 175 feet by 225 feet with the longer frontage facing east and bordering upon Blue Lakes Boulevard North. The City’s Zoning Ordinance No. 1034 presently classifies the whole property as C-4, a Plant Nursery District, and limits its business use to restricted floral purposes only. Appellants may otherwise use their property as a one-family…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Diocese of Rochester v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1956

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cole-Collister Fire Protection District v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Workman Family Partnership v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API