Legal Opinion
Cole-Collister Fire Protection District v. City of Boise
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1970No. 10320PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.
The plaintiff-respondent, ColeCollister Fire Protection District, owns a vacant parcel of real property located on the Northwest corner of the intersection of Cole and Ustick Roads in the City of Boise. Pursuant to I.C. § 50-1201 et seq., Boise City zoned the property in question “L-O” or “Limited Office District.” 1 This designation precludes the erection of a gasoline station on property situated within the “L-O” zone.2 The respondent orig*561inally purchased the property in question for use as a fire station. However the need for a fire station in this area became obviated…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Cooper v. Bd. of County Com'rs of Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Gumprecht v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Cowan v. Board of Com'rs of Fremont CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Mills v. BridgesIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.