Legal Opinion
City of Idaho Falls v. Grimmett
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1941No. 6833PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.
— Respondent, a municipal corporation, is a city of the second class. About August 18, 1928, Ordinance No. 431 was enacted by the mayor and city council, by the terms of which the city was divided into five zoning districts as follows: “A” residence zone; “B” commercial zone; “C” industrial zone; “D” quiet zone; and “E” unrestricted zone.
About December 6, 1934, appellant Grimmett, being the owner of Lots 47 and 48, Block 53 of Crow’s Addition to respondent city, being in residence zone “A,” made application in writing to the mayor and council, “for a permit to construct a Contractor’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Cooper v. Bd. of County Com'rs of Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Rowe v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Cole-Collister Fire Protection District v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.