Legal Opinion
Marroquin v. F. MONARCA MASONRY
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 1, 2010No. AC 30692PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
This workers’ compensation appeal arises out of a dispute between two employers, F. Monarca Masonry (Monarca) and MRI Construction, Inc. (MRI), both defendants in this case, 1 as to which of them is responsible for surgical and indemnity benefits arising from two surgical procedures that the nonap-pearing plaintiff, Dennis Marroquin, (claimant) underwent after experiencing severe pain on September 20, 2004. MRI appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the findings and conclusion of the workers’ compensation commissioner…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Toro v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. STATE, JUDICIAL BRANCHConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- DeJesus v. R.P.M. Enterprises, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Gill v. Brescome Barton, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Wilson v. Maefair Health Care CentersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015