Legal Opinion
Remin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 1984No. 82-1254PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YEAGLEY, Associate Judge, Retired:
The two petitioners (Morris Remin and Stanley Westreich), each the landlord at some point, seek review of a decision of the District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission (hereinafter Commission) which affirmed the Rent Administrator’s decision to roll back the rent and award treble damages to the tenant. On appeal, petitioner Remin contends that the Commission erred in denying him the benefit of the “4-unit exemption” of § 205(a)(4) of the Rental Housing Act of 1977. 1 Both petitioners contend that the Commission erred in affirming the Hearing Examiner’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Newsweek Magazine v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Totz v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Neer v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bernstein v. LimeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- McCulloch v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Goodman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Winchester Van Buren Tenants Ass'n v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Tenants of 738 Longfellow Street, N.W. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Ungar v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.