Legal Opinion
Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 28, 1989No. 88-607PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
Although understandably less popular with landlords, of whom there are relatively few, than with tenants, of whom there are many, rent “stabilization” and rent control have been around for a long time in the District of Columbia, and their death-knell on constitutional grounds does not appear to be around the corner. Pennell v. City of San Jose, 485 U.S. 1, 8-15, 108 S.Ct. 849, 855-859, 99 L.Ed.2d 1 (1988); see also Hornstein v. Barry, 560 A.2d 530, 537-38 (D.C.1989) (en banc). The terminology of some of the provisions of our legislation is not characterized by the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & FlomDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Simpson v. District of Columbia Office of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.