Legal Opinion
Bernstein v. Lime
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 4, 1952No. 1266PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
This was an action for possession of housing accommodations brought on the ground that the tenancy had been terminated by the service of a 30-day notice to quit and that the premises were not subject to the District of Columbia Rent Control Act. The case was tried by jury, and from an adverse verdict and judgment plaintiffs bring this appeal.
At the trial, defendant having conceded the validity of the 30-day notice, plaintiffs attempted to prove that they were entitled to possession since the premises were no longer under rent control. Code 1951, Supp. I, § 45-1611(a)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Savage v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Woods v. Oak Park Chateau CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- Remin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Tenants of 738 Longfellow Street, N.W. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Revithes v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Temple v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Cambridge Management Co. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.