Legal Opinion
Ungar v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1987No. 85-1070PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
Norbert T. Ungar, a landlord, petitions for review of the District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission’s (the “Commission”) decision to affirm a determination by the District of Columbia Rental Accommodations Office (the “Office”) 2 that petitioner’s rental units exhibited numerous Housing Code violations and that a rental increase agreement obtained by petitioner, purportedly pursuant to D.C.Code § 45-1526 (1981); 35 DCMR § 3512, was void because it was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, and coercion. In addition, the Commission affirmed the hearing examiner’s order to roll back rents…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel, Hotel & Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Henderson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Launay v. Launay, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Frazier v. Franklin Inv. Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Federal Marketing Co. v. Virginia Impression Products Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Stansel v. American Security BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Jerome Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Campbell-Crane & Associates, Inc. v. StamenkovicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- General Federation of Women's Clubs v. Iron Gate Inn, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.