Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Pamida, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 1997No. S-95-360PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
INTRODUCTION
Appellant, Marty Daniels, filed a petition alleging a cause of action in negligence against appellee Pamida, Inc. Both parties moved the district court for summary judgment. This appeal follows the district court order which overruled Daniels’ motion and sustained Pamida’s motion. Finding no error, we affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Daniels was employed by A-Help, Inc., at the time of his injury. A-Help is a labor broker in the business of providing temporary labor services to employers such as Pamida. A-Help assigned Daniels to work in Pamida’s warehouse, where on December 17, 1992,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Danek v. Meldrum Manufacturing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- St. Claire v. Minnesota Harbor Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
- Bohl v. Buffalo CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Plock v. Crossroads Joint VentureNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Tompkins v. RainesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- USA Waste of Maryland, Inc. v. LoveDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Schweitzer v. American National Red CrossNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Kaiser v. Millard Lumber, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Frank v. Hawaii Planing Mill FoundationHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Bowens v. Allied Warehousing Services, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.