Legal Opinion

Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 24, 1998PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

These consolidated cases concern the process for classifying sex offenders under the sex offender registration and community notification act (act), G. L. c. 6, §§ 178C-1780. Two Superior Court judges ruled that those individuals classified as level three offenders have constitutionally protected *91liberty and privacy interests sufficient to require evidentiary hearings before a final classification and before they may be required to register and their registration information may be disseminated to the public. They also ruled that the sex offender registry board (board) has the burden of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Baker v. ParsonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Roe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. LeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API