Legal Opinion

Roe v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 28, 2001PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.

This is a direct appeal from an order of a Superior Court judge allowing a preliminary injunction in a class action suit challenging St. 1999, c. 74, § 2, “An Act improving the sex offender registry and establishing civil commitment and community parole supervision for life for sex offenders” (the 1999 statute). The judge determined that the 1999 statute did not provide “sufficient meaningful due process protection,” and issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendants from requiring sex offenders to register pursuant to the statute without first offering them an individualized,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. KeefnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. KnappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API