Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lee

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 2007No. 38 EAP 2004 and 15 EAP 2005PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

I. Introduction

In Commonwealth v. Gomer Williams, 574 Pa. 487, 832 A.2d 962 (2003) (hereinafter G. Williams), this Court considered and rejected several constitutional challenges to Pennsylvania’s Registration of Sexual Offenders Act, Act of May 10, 2000, P.L. 74, No. 18, as amended, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9791, et seq. (Megan’s Law II). 1 Specifically, we held that the registration, notification, and counseling (RNC) requirements that attach, under Megan’s Law II, to offenders deemed Sexually Violent Predators (SVP) are not punitive. 2 Because we found these provisions to be…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In the Interest of J.B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API