Legal Opinion

Ottenheimer v. Real Estate Division of the Nevada Department of Commerce

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1981No. 11377PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This action was commenced by Charles J. Ottenheimer, “a registered representative” under NRS 119.090, asking that the 1973 amendment to NRS 119.180 be determined unconstitutional as an invalid exercise of the state’s police powers. Before the amendment (SB 259, Stat. Nev. 1973, Ch. 792), a “registered representative” could offer or sell subdivision property, without being licensed under NRS Chapter 645 as a real estate salesman or broker. As of January 1, 1975, such amendment required that to sell land under NRS Chapter 119, a “registered representative” must be licensed as a salesman…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Viale v. FoleyNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Damus v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc. v. DraneyNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Ottenheimer v. Real Estate Division of the Nevada Department of CommerceNevada Supreme Court · 1975

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martinez v. MaruszczakNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Allen v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Sheriff of Washoe County v. MartinNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Sheriff, Clark County v. LuqmanNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. List v. WhislerNevada Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API