Legal Opinion
Koscot Interplanetary, Inc. v. Draney
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1974No. 6930PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Batjer, J.:
The appellant, Koscot Interplanetary, Inc. (Koscot), qualified to do business in the State of Nevada and at the time this controversy arose was engaged in the sale of cosmetics.
The Koscot cosmetics products are manufactured exclusively in Koscot’s plant. The expansion and growth of Koscot is built upon a scheme for the sale of positions with the company, which sales authorize individuals to sell not only the cosmetic products but also additional positions with the company. When a person purchases a sales position with Koscot, the one instrumental in selling him…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. GlusmanNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Allen v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Town of Eureka v. Office of the State EngineerNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- List v. WhislerNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Excello Wine Co. v. Monsieur Henri Wines, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.