Legal Opinion

Ottenheimer v. Real Estate Division of the Nevada Department of Commerce

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1975No. Nos. 7975 and 8004; Nos. 8031, 8032, 8033, 8034 and 8035PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*341OPINION

2Per curiam

These consolidated appeals arise from suits commenced by persons qualified as “registered representatives” under NRS 119.090, asking that a 1973 amendment to NRS 119.180 be declared unconstitutional. Before the amendment, a “registered representative” could offer or sell subdivision property, without being licensed under NRS Chapter 645 as a real estate salesman or broker. As of January 1, 1975, such amendment would require that to sell land under NRS Chapter 119, a “registered representative” must be licensed as a salesman or broker.

In Case No. 7975, appellant Ottenheimer sought to…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Viale v. FoleyNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Zuni Construction Co. v. Great American InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. King v. Board of Regents of the University of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc. v. DraneyNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Memory Gardens of Las Vegas, Inc. v. Pet Ponderosa Memorial Gardens, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1972

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lipshie v. Tracy Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Kuban v. McGimseyNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Nevada Wholesale Lumber Co. v. Myers Realty, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ottenheimer v. Real Estate Division of the Nevada Department of CommerceNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Harmon v. Telerent Leasing Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API