Legal Opinion

Sheriff, Clark County v. Luqman

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1985No. 14566, 14858PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Clark County Sheriff’s Department appeals from two orders granting pretrial habeas corpus relief to respondents who were arrested for violating various provisions of Nevada’s controlled substance act. There are three basic issues before this court: whether the 1981 amendment 1 to the Uniform Controlled Substances Act (UCSA) unconstitutionally delegates to the state board of pharmacy the legislative power to define the elements of a crime; whether the said amendment is unconstitutionally vague for failing to provide adequate notice of the conduct proscribed by its provisions; and,…

3Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by26 opinions

  1. We The People Nevada ex rel. Angle v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Banegas Ex Rel. Banegas v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Bolden v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Christopher Tiplick v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Sheriff v. BurchamNevada Supreme Court · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API