Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 24, 1954No. 743PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The gravamen of the plaintiffs’ cause of action is that the defendant Harper, being under legal duty to maintain the drain pipe under his land, negligently permitted it to remain in a known state of disrepair, thereby proximately causing the injury and damage in suit.

The individual defendant takes the position it was the sole duty of the City of Winston-Salem to maintain the drain, and that if this be so, he may not be held actionably negligent for failure to make the repairs.

Therefore, at the threshold of the appeal we are confronted with the question whether the evidence below is sufficient…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ChessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Hall v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Hedgecock v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Porter v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  5. Supervisor & Commissioners of Pickens County v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Asheville Sports Properties, LLC v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Braswell v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. MILNER HOTELS, INCORPORATED v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API