Legal Opinion

Braswell v. State Highway & Public Works Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1959No. 252PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Respondent, by demurrer filed here and by exceptions duly noted in the record, presents for determination these questions: (1) Does the amended petition state a cause of action; (2) if so, does the evidence require submission of issues to the jury; and (3) was prejudicial error committed during the trial entitling respondent to a venire de novo?

An answer to the first question is not only essential, but the reasons which are the basis for the answer will materially simplify the solution of the remaining questions. The answer is, of course, to be found by looking at the facts alleged. For that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Nevins v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Turner v. BlackburnDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1975
  3. Moses v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Chappell v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. City of Kings Mountain v. GoforthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API