Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Chesson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1950No. 164PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

With respect to surface water, the duties of owners of adjoining lands respectively on a different level are reciprocal and complementary. The lower land is servient to that on a higher level in the sense that it must receive the natural flow of surface water from the higher land; and the servient owner must dispose of it as best he can without in turn becoming an offender.

Here we are concerned with the duties of the owners or occupants of the land on the higher level. Such owners or occupants cannot divert the surface water or interfere with its natural flow by artificial obstruction or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Ryder v. Town of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Porter v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Webb v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Poor v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Belk, Incorporated v. Meyer Corporation, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. Lasercomb America, Inc. v. Job Reynolds Larry Holliday, and Holiday Steel Rule Die CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  4. Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Bernard v. Central Carolina Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API