Legal Opinion

MILNER HOTELS, INCORPORATED v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 23, 1966No. 530PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

In Johnson v. Winston-Salem, 239 N.C. 697, at p. 707, 81 S.E. 2d 153, which is cited by the Present Chief Justice Parker, in Hormel & Company v. Winston-Salem, 263 N.C. 666, at p. 675, 140 S.E. 2d 362, it is said: “The general rule is that a municipality becomes responsible for maintenance, and liable for injuries resulting from a want of due care in respect to upkeep, of drains and culverts constructed by third persons when, and only when, they are adopted as a part of its drainage system, or the municipality assumes control and management thereof.” That this is the generally accepted rule…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. GEO. A. HORMEL & COMPANY v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matternes v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Asheville Sports Properties, LLC v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Ward v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Hooper v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Kizer v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API