MILNER HOTELS, INCORPORATED v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.
In Johnson v. Winston-Salem, 239 N.C. 697, at p. 707, 81 S.E. 2d 153, which is cited by the Present Chief Justice Parker, in Hormel & Company v. Winston-Salem, 263 N.C. 666, at p. 675, 140 S.E. 2d 362, it is said: “The general rule is that a municipality becomes responsible for maintenance, and liable for injuries resulting from a want of due care in respect to upkeep, of drains and culverts constructed by third persons when, and only when, they are adopted as a part of its drainage system, or the municipality assumes control and management thereof.” That this is the generally accepted rule…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- GEO. A. HORMEL & COMPANY v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matternes v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Asheville Sports Properties, LLC v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Ward v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Hooper v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Kizer v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.