Legal Opinion

Rule v. City of Stamford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court refusing to grant an injunction sought by certain residents and taxpayers of the city of Stamford to restrain the officers of the city from proceeding with the sale of certain municipal bonds. The plaintiffs make several claims upon which they base their contention that the issuance of bonds was not properly authorized, but it is necessary to consider only one of them and hence to state only those facts relevant to the issue so raised. In discussing the matter we shall refer to sections of the city charter as revised in 1933. 21 Special…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Long v. Lemoyne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. New York & New England Railroad v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  3. State ex rel. School District No. Six v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. State v. SerensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jack v. TorrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. Burke v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Jewett v. Luau-Nyack Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Sheehan v. AltschulerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  5. Fraser v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API