Legal Opinion

State v. Serenson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to circuit court, Day county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge. Henry Serenson was convicted of embezzlement and brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.

The trial of plaintiff in error upon a valid indictment, in which he was accused with the embezzlement of $755.3U, resulted in a verdict of guilty as charged, and a judgment was accordingly entered. From the evidence introduced in support of the allegations of the indictment, it appears that the defendant, in his official capacity as sheriff, received as money, on the 17th day of July, 1894, from certain mortgagors named in the indictment, a draft for $700, drawn by a Chicago bank in favor of itself, together with $55.30 in currency, all of which was thus paid for the purpose of redeeming…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The People v. . GuidiciNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Norton v. SjolsethWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  2. State v. GrantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. HarstedWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. State v. RaiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API