Legal Opinion

Long v. Lemoyne Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1908No. Appeal, No. 44PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal, No. 44, Jan. T., 1908, by defendant, from order of C. P. Cumberland Co., Sept. T., 1907, No. 167, discharging rule to strike off judgment in case of S. W. Long, for use of the Cumberland Valley Bank, v. Lemoyne Borough. Rule to strike off judgment. Before Sadler, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was order discharging rule to strike off judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Beown,

The borough of Lemoyne was incorporate^. May 23,' 1905. The first meeting of its council was held July 26, following. The new borough being without funds to enable it to start properly on its municipal career, its council, on October 31, 1905, passed the following resolution: “Resolved, That the Borough of Lemoyne borrow from the Cumberland Valley Bank for general Borough purposes the sum of ($500) Five Hundred Dollars and that the President of Town Council and Borough Treasurer be authorized and directed to execute a note in the name of the Borough of Lemoyne, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Schuylkill Light, Heat and Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Borough of Rainsburg v. FyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Bryn Mawr National Bank v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Trainer v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Oswald v. WB Public Square Associates, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Luzerne Township v. Fayette CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Erie Insurance v. BullardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Eddy v. Ashley BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API