Legal Opinion

Shaievitz v. Laks

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 3, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state jurisdictional facts.

The complaint was filled November, 1946. Its allegations, as of that date, were sufficient to set up a good cause of action under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. Defendant is said to manufacture men’s and boys’ sport jackets. In Paragraph 8 of the complaint plaintiff alleges that “the defendants employed the plaintiff * * * for workweeks longer than the applicable maximum number of hours * * * and failed and refused to compensate the plaintiff for such…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1947
  2. Burfeind v. Eagle-Picher Co. of TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1947
  3. Holland v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1947
  4. Bartels v. Sperti, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  5. Cochran v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Culkin v. Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
  2. Welsh v. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Amelbo v. Pennsylvania Salt Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Thomas v. Hempt Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API