Shaievitz v. Laks
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
KNOX, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state jurisdictional facts.
The complaint was filled November, 1946. Its allegations, as of that date, were sufficient to set up a good cause of action under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. Defendant is said to manufacture men’s and boys’ sport jackets. In Paragraph 8 of the complaint plaintiff alleges that “the defendants employed the plaintiff * * * for workweeks longer than the applicable maximum number of hours * * * and failed and refused to compensate the plaintiff for such…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1947
- Burfeind v. Eagle-Picher Co. of TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1947
- Holland v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1947
- Bartels v. Sperti, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Cochran v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Culkin v. Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
- Welsh v. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Amelbo v. Pennsylvania Salt Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Thomas v. Hempt Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1950