Legal Opinion
Culkin v. Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided April 30, 1951No. Civ. 594PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOHOE, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs, Wren L. Culkin, Glen West, Francis H. Masker and Alex Feilmeyer brought this action against the Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Company, 1 a corporation, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, to recover compensation for overtime under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 as amended 2 . The defendant asserts that as to the claims of all the parties, other than the four individuals named above, the statute of limitations is a bar because, as to them, the action was not commenced within the time allowed 3 . In this connection the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kenneth J. Hill v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co. v. CulkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Agner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Mitchell v. Stewart Brothers Construction CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1960
- Nixon v. City of Junction City, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.