Cochran v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
LEAVY, District Judge.
We have here four cases that are consolidated for the purpose of considering the motions which are similar in all of them, and the consolidation of course was made with the thought that it would expedite disposition of the issues that have been raised by these motions. All of these cases are at issue. They have been on file in this court for almost a year. Their origin followed shortly after the Supreme Court pronouncement in the Anderson v. Mount Clemens Pottery, 328, U.S. 680, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515, interpreting the language of the Fair Labor Standards Act of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Struthers Wells Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1947
- Kemp v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Bartels v. Sperti, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Jackson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.