Legal Opinion
Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 14, 1947No. Civ. A. 3454PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The important question in this case is the constitutionality of the recent Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, approved May 14, 1947, being Chapter 52, Public Law 49, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq. But preliminarily there is a technical question of pleading to be considered. It arises in this way.
On February 19, 1947, the suit in this case was first filed by Ray Seese, President, and Curtis Wolfe, Secretary of Local 24, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, for themselves individually and on behalf of more than one hundred additional employees to recover…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Walter L. Compton, Jr. v. Alton Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Manosky v. Bethlehem-Hingham Shipyard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Fisch v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.