Legal Opinion

Welsh v. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1950No. Civ. No. 6842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

The complaint is predicated upon the theory that plaintiffs come within the provisions of Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 207, and entitled to overtime compensation for any part of a work week in excess of forty hours. Defendant contends that it is subject to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and that a forty-eight hour week is the proper basis. The .claim covers a period from March 15, 1945, to December 9, 1947.

Defendant originally filed a motion for summary judgment, and as the result of some discussion…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Morris v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. IspassSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walter L. Compton, Jr. v. Alton Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  2. Culkin v. Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
  3. American President Lines, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
  4. Love v. U. S. Rubber Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. State of New Hampshire v. Roger RoySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API