Silva v. Hawn
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to restrain defendant from obstructing the flow of water in an irrigating ditch and plaintiff’s use thereof and to have the court decree that the said ditch is appurtenant to plaintiff’s land. Plaintiff had judgment, from which defendant appeals on bill of exceptions.
Plaintiff is the owner of sections 17 and 20 in township 13 south, range 19 east, in Fresno county, and defendant is the owner of the north half of the northeast quarter of section 16 in said township. It will thus be seen that defendant’s land lies northeast from plaintiff’s land and one-half mile from the east…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hesperia Land & Water Co. v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Franz v. MendoncaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- De Frieze v. QuintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Oneto v. RestanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Gurnsey v. Antelope Creek & Red Bluff Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- Carlson v. Assessment Appeals Board ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Stepp v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Collins v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.