Fenton v. Miller
Michigan Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from Mackinac; Adams, J. Bill by Charles B. Fenton against Annie M. Wendell-Miller, Eva M. 'Wendell-McKinnon, and Romain I. Wendell, for a partition of real estate. From the decree rendered, complainant and defendant Romain I. Wendell appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Complainant filed the original bill in this case, praying for a partition of lot 12 in the village Mackinac. An answer was put in, and subsequently proceedings were stayed until the title of complainant could be established at law. This complainant was able to do (see Fenton v. Miller, 108 Mich. 246); and thereupon, on the 5th day of October, 1896, an amended and supplemental bill was filed, setting up that, since the filing of the original bill, Annie M. Wendell-Miller and Eva M. Wendell-McKinnon had conveyed their interests in the property to Romain I. Wendell, and praying partition, or, if…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Everts v. BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Hunt v. HuntMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Hoffman v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Fenton v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by19 opinions
- Henkel v. HenkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Geisendorff v. CobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Silich v. RongersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Frenzel v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.