Legal Opinion

Henkel v. Henkel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1937No. Docket No. 28, Calendar No. 39,479PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiffs filed a bill for partition of real estate in Grosse Pointe Park village, Wayne county. Robert Henkel devised to his wife, Athene, a life estate therein and, upon her death, the fee to Athene H. Pitt, his daughter, and Robert C. P. Henkel and Fredrec Y. Henkel, his sons, share, and share alike. Robert Henkel died and his will was duly admitted to probate and after the death of his widow, Athene, this suit was brought, and, pending suit, Mrs. Pitt conveyed her interest to Fredrec Y. Henkel. Defendants, by way of cross-bill, object to partition by sale; charge Fredrec Y. Henkel with…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Pillow v. Southwest Virginia Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Godfrey v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Temple Marital TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Schnell v. SchnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. De Bartolo v. Di BattistaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  4. DeBartolo v. DiBattistaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  5. Berg v. KremersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API