Hunt v. Hunt
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from St. Joseph; Yaple, J. Bill by Truman Hunt against Seth T. Hunt and others for a partition. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is a proceeding for partition. Complainant and Seth T. Hunt are father and son. On the face of the record they appear as tenants in common of the property in question, a farm of about 250 ácres in St. Joseph county. The property is subject to a mortgage, the principal of which is $4,000. The complainant’s title is derived through his son, W. Bansom Hunt. Defendants seek to raise four points on the appeal:(1) That complainant deeded the land to defendant Seth T. Hunt prior to the institution of this proceeding.(2) That in the decree of the court below the court charged against each…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Faxton v. FaxonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Hill v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Shepherd v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Henkel v. HenkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Fenton v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Frenzel v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Hardesty v. NaharkeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.