Legal Opinion

Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. Hall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1864PublishedCited by 53 opinions

Error to Washtenaw Circuit, to which the case had been transferred from Jackson. All the material facts, appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Christiancy J:

This was a suit brought by Hall against the company, upon two policies of insurance against loss by fire; one upon a stock of goods in plaintiff’s store in the village of Hamburg, Livingston county, Michigan, to the amount of two thousand dollars, dated January 18th, 1860; and the other for a like amount in the aggregate, upon plaintiff’s dwelling house, furniture, clothing, barn and shed, hay and grain, and on his store (building) there situate, the amount insured upon each item being specified; that upon the store building being one hundred and fifty dollars. This policy is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frost v. Saratoga Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Graves & Barnewall v. Boston Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  3. Masters v. Madison County Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Bidwell v. . the North Western Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  5. Pearson v. LordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Viele v. Germania InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Westchester Fire Insurance v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Melson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API