Legal Opinion

Everts v. Beach

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1875PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Oakland Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, Ch. J.

Beach as guardian sued Everts to recover on account of his alleged use and occupation of an undivided two-thirds of a parcel of land said to have been owned by Everts and the wards of Beach as tenants in common. The case was tried before a jury and Beach recovered. The maiu facts were briefly as follows: In 1842 Lydia Webster, the mother of the wards of Beach, received from her father conveyance of the parcel of land in question, and with her husband, William R. Webster, vent into possession and occupied it until her death in 1863. These parties had three children; the infants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woolever v. KnappNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Brown v. WellingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Merritt v. NickelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Campau v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Newbold v. SmartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Fenton v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Williams v. Sinclair Refining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API