Legal Opinion

Tomei v. Henning

California Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1967No. S. F. No. 22511PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from the part of a judgment entered against her upon a jury verdict on her complaint to recover damages for medical malpractice. Defendant appeals from the part of the judgment entered upon the verdict against him on his cross-complaint to recover *321the value of his professional services and reimbursement for payments of other medical expenses made by him on plaintiff ’s behalf.

Defendant performed a hysterectomy on plaintiff. During the operation he accidentally sutured her right ureter in two places. The accident was not discovered until four days later. A urologist attempted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Clark v. GibbonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Davis v. Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Jiminez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Capelouto v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API