Legal Opinion

Capelouto v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

California Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1972No. L.A. 29972PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

In this case we consider the right of an infant to recover damages for the pain and suffering incidental to an illness contracted as a result of medical malpractice. As we explain below, an infant may recover damages for pain and suffering on the same basis as an adult. Indeed, lay testimony, as well as expert testimony, may support such an award. Moreover, in certain cases the trier of fact may infer pain and suffering from the nature of the injury alone. In accordance with these principles we hold that in the instant case an instruction to the jury foreclosing…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API