Capelouto v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
In this case we consider the right of an infant to recover damages for the pain and suffering incidental to an illness contracted as a result of medical malpractice. As we explain below, an infant may recover damages for pain and suffering on the same basis as an adult. Indeed, lay testimony, as well as expert testimony, may support such an award. Moreover, in certain cases the trier of fact may infer pain and suffering from the nature of the injury alone. In accordance with these principles we hold that in the instant case an instruction to the jury foreclosing…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.