Legal Opinion

Davis v. Memorial Hospital

California Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1962No. Sac. 7412PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant, contending that the court committed prejudicial error in refusing instructions offered by plaintiff on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

On January 6, 1959, plaintiff entered defendant hospital for a varicose vein operation and was given a presurgical enema by a nurse, who inserted a rubber tube into his rectum. The hospital records do not show which of the nurses gave the enema, and none of those on duty at the time recalled doing so. Plaintiff testified that four attempts were made to insert the tube, that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hardin v. San Jose City Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wolfsmith v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Bauer v. OtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Baker v. B. F. Goodrich Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Quintal v. Laurel Grove HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Meier v. Ross General HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Putensen v. Clay Adams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Sloan v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API