Legal Opinion
United States v. Greg Carter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 2014No. 12-10549PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam Opinion; Dissent by Judge ZOUHARY.
OPINION
2Per curiam
Defendant-Appellant Greg Carter (“Carter”) appeals from the district court’s partial denial of his “Motion to Clarify Conditions of Supervised Release and the Amount and Current Status of Restitution.” Carter argues he and his codefendants are not liable for the remaining restitution balance, after the credit of forfeited assets, because everyone at Carter’s sentencing hearing believed that the forfeited assets would satisfy the restitution obligation. We hold the district court had jurisdiction to enforce its restitution judgment and…
3Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Robert S. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Michael H. Boulware, United States of America v. Michael H. BoulwareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Larry L. EmersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Steven B. Tencer and Ronald Lazar, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Nidal Ahmed Waked HatumCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Kramer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020
- United States v. $158,677.17 In United States CurrencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- United States v. James DuckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.