Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided August 6, 1982No. 5859, 6112 and 6151PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Judge.

This appeal concerns three consolidated Anchorage district court cases. Richard Cooley, Bienvenido Marine and William Thompson were each charged in two count complaints with driving while intoxicated, AMC 9.28.020, and with driving with a blood or breath alcohol level in excess of 0.10 percent, AMC 9.28.030. 1 In a jury tri al, Cooley was found guilty on both counts. Juries acquitted Marine and Thompson of the driving while intoxicated charge but found them guilty on the 0.10 percent theory. Because all have raised similar challenges to the 0.10 ordinance and to the use of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Municipality of Anchorage v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  3. Slagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. AriziniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Denison v. AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Forte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Fuenning v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Municipality of Anchorage v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API